Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vijay Goel (lawyer)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 14:39, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Vijay Goel (lawyer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I am unable to locate any significant coverage with WP:CORPDEPTH and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability. Timberlack (talk) 05:46, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Timberlack (talk) 05:46, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Timberlack (talk) 05:46, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Timberlack (talk) 05:46, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: Nominator has been blocked as a UPE sock. Blablubbs|talk 20:29, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Since nom has been sock-blocked, relist for good-faith comments instead of soft delete.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:03, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Relisting comment: Since nom has been sock-blocked, relist for good-faith comments instead of soft delete.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:03, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete notwithstanding the technical questionability of the nom. Besides failing WP:GNG - the subject hasn't done anything that has garnered signficiant coverage - he is completely non-notable as a lawyer per my long-standing standards. I don't see that any of the awards are major. Lawyers do lots of things that get them an award or recognition. I have certificates and awards from the Sierra Club and local bar associations, and while I treasure them in my portfolios, they do not make me notable, either. This appears to be a run of the mill lawyer. Bearian (talk) 17:07, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.